The model selection desk

AI model leaderboard.

Compare model runs across seven suites from an independent benchmark. Start with a task, inspect the tradeoffs, and follow every number back to its source.

LiveBench 2.0Release 2026-10-14Source checked 49 model runs · 7 suites

49 model runs

Filter keeps the full-board rank · select up to 3 models

Overall is the equal-weight mean of all seven suite scores. Models with missing suites remain visible but receive no overall rank.

RankModel / measured configurationOverall scoreUSD / benchmark taskCoverageCompare
1Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic · effort: max87.99$4.4847/7suite scores
2Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic · effort: max86.53$3.6267/7suite scores
3GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · effort: max86.14$3.2777/7suite scores
4GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI · effort: max85.41$0.6207/7suite scores
5Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle · effort: high84.10$1.5167/7suite scores
6Claude Fable 5Anthropic · effort: max83.61$5.3137/7suite scores
7Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic · effort: max82.46$2.8997/7suite scores
8Claude Opus 5Anthropic · effort: max82.09$3.6547/7suite scores
9GPT-6 SolOpenAI · effort: max81.91$0.8657/7suite scores
10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek · effort: max · source-reported open weights79.20$0.1317/7suite scores
11Muse Wonder 1.0Meta · effort: max78.10$1.4097/7suite scores
12DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · effort: max · source-reported open weights78.04$0.1677/7suite scores
13Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · effort: max76.77$3.8127/7suite scores
14GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · effort: max76.26$1.8357/7suite scores
15Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic · effort: max75.64$0.6197/7suite scores
16GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI · effort: max74.99$1.2067/7suite scores
17Grok 4.6xAI · effort: xhigh74.94$0.9287/7suite scores
18MiMo V2.6 ProXiaomi · effort: high · source-reported open weights74.87$0.1257/7suite scores
19Muse Spark 1.3Meta · effort: max74.76$0.7947/7suite scores
20Grok 4.7xAI · effort: xhigh74.09$1.9917/7suite scores
21MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax · effort: max · source-reported open weights73.09$0.1067/7suite scores
22Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · effort: max72.99$2.5957/7suite scores
23GLM-5.3 FlashZ.AI · effort: max · source-reported open weights70.61$0.1087/7suite scores
24Grok 4.5xAI · effort: xhigh70.06$0.5197/7suite scores
25GPT-6 LunaOpenAI · effort: max69.40$0.0887/7suite scores
26Qwen3.8 FlashAlibaba · effort: max · source-reported open weights68.79$0.1357/7suite scores
27GPT-5.5OpenAI · effort: xhigh68.70$2.2047/7suite scores
28Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle · effort: high67.34$0.7897/7suite scores
29Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle · effort: high67.19$0.6177/7suite scores
30GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI · effort: max66.09$0.2237/7suite scores
31Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · effort: max65.09$1.6847/7suite scores
32Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba · effort: max · source-reported open weights64.24$1.0247/7suite scores
33DeepSeek V4 Flash VisionDeepSeek · effort: max · source-reported open weights63.63$0.1417/7suite scores
34Kimi K3Moonshot AI · effort: max · source-reported open weights63.39$1.1967/7suite scores
35Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba · effort: max · source-reported open weights62.66$0.5197/7suite scores
36Muse Spark 1.2Meta · effort: xhigh62.40$0.5807/7suite scores
37Step 5 (Preview)StepFun · effort: max · source-reported open weights62.01$0.7507/7suite scores
38GLM-5.3Z.AI · effort: max · source-reported open weights60.74—7/7suite scores
39Muse Spark OpenMeta · effort: max · source-reported open weights57.57$0.4887/7suite scores
40Beam 1.0Reflection AI · effort: max · source-reported open weights55.50—7/7suite scores
41Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle · effort: high54.91$0.6987/7suite scores
42MiniMax M3MiniMax · effort: max · source-reported open weights53.74$0.2517/7suite scores
43InklingThinking Machines · effort: max51.91$0.9017/7suite scores
44Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA · effort: max · source-reported open weights51.47$0.1407/7suite scores
45Mistral Large 4Mistral AI · effort: high47.70$0.6737/7suite scores
46Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · effort: max46.04—7/7suite scores
47Gemma 4 31BGoogle · effort: max · source-reported open weights41.53$0.0717/7suite scores
48Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA · effort: max · source-reported open weights40.83$0.5067/7suite scores
49Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA · effort: max · source-reported open weights28.69$0.0537/7suite scores

Inspect a model’s evidence

Each panel records the exact source model ID, effort label, suite scores and recorded cost context. Provider and open-weight labels come from the benchmark manifest.

Claude Fable 5.1 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Browser is its highest-scoring suite (100.0), while Data Analysis is lowest (80.3). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Fable 5.1
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic80.8$51.573
Reasoning91.7$0.460
Coding97.7$5.282
Browser100.0$3.746
Data Analysis80.3$1.333
Research82.0$20.886
Design83.4$7.376

Source model ID: claude-fable-5.1. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Opus 5.5 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (96.3), while Browser is lowest (80.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Opus 5.5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic85.0$38.009
Reasoning92.2$0.252
Coding96.3$5.031
Browser80.0$14.670
Data Analysis80.3$0.815
Research85.0$8.818
Design86.9$5.748

Source model ID: claude-opus-5.5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-6 Astra · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (93.7), while Design is lowest (82.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-6 Astra
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic82.4$38.379
Reasoning92.7$0.390
Coding93.7$3.315
Browser84.0$5.910
Data Analysis83.0$0.699
Research85.2$17.660
Design82.0$2.876

Source model ID: gpt-6-astra. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-6.1 Sol · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (96.0), while Long Agentic is lowest (73.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-6.1 Sol
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic73.0$6.488
Reasoning92.6$0.080
Coding96.0$0.482
Browser88.0$2.437
Data Analysis82.7$0.145
Research83.5$2.415
Design82.1$0.371

Source model ID: gpt-6.1-sol. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Gemini 4 Argon · Google · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (95.1), while Long Agentic is lowest (69.9). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Gemini 4 Argon
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic69.9$13.842
Reasoning95.1$0.078
Coding89.7$5.076
Browser92.0$3.434
Data Analysis85.2$0.284
Research83.1$5.956
Design73.7$1.160

Source model ID: gemini-4-argon. Effort label: high. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Fable 5 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (98.3), while Long Agentic is lowest (53.2). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Fable 5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic53.2$59.737
Reasoning89.7$0.602
Coding98.3$8.927
Browser92.0$10.302
Data Analysis80.5$1.301
Research86.9$17.274
Design84.7$8.549

Source model ID: claude-fable-5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (94.7), while Data Analysis is lowest (59.5). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Sonnet 5.5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic78.8$35.011
Reasoning91.6$0.209
Coding94.7$4.022
Browser84.0$7.659
Data Analysis59.5$0.531
Research83.6$8.186
Design85.0$5.017

Source model ID: claude-sonnet-5.5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Opus 5 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (91.2), while Long Agentic is lowest (62.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Opus 5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic62.1$48.753
Reasoning91.2$0.168
Coding90.8$3.922
Browser84.0$2.965
Data Analysis74.6$0.746
Research88.9$16.970
Design83.0$5.453

Source model ID: claude-opus-5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-6 Sol · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (93.1), while Long Agentic is lowest (66.9). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-6 Sol
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic66.9$8.621
Reasoning88.7$0.121
Coding93.1$0.977
Browser92.0$3.284
Data Analysis81.2$0.199
Research69.3$3.505
Design82.2$0.425

Source model ID: gpt-6-sol. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · DeepSeek · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (96.0), while Long Agentic is lowest (50.9). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic50.9$1.458
Reasoning89.1$0.024
Coding96.0$0.196
Browser76.0$0.245
Data Analysis79.5$0.033
Research79.5$0.375
Design83.4$0.212

Source model ID: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Muse Wonder 1.0 · Meta · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (90.6), while Long Agentic is lowest (53.2). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Muse Wonder 1.0
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic53.2$14.483
Reasoning90.6$0.298
Coding86.2$3.102
Browser72.0$4.138
Data Analysis81.6$0.366
Research88.0$3.506
Design75.1$0.687

Source model ID: muse-wonder-1.0. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · DeepSeek · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (90.2), while Long Agentic is lowest (40.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic40.1$1.742
Reasoning86.7$0.046
Coding90.2$0.238
Browser84.0$0.349
Data Analysis79.3$0.071
Research86.8$0.409
Design79.2$0.175

Source model ID: deepseek-v4.1-flash. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Opus 4.8 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Browser is its highest-scoring suite (96.0), while Long Agentic is lowest (48.3). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Opus 4.8
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic48.3$51.970
Reasoning89.2$0.606
Coding77.3$4.152
Browser96.0$8.872
Data Analysis66.0$0.646
Research81.8$6.235
Design78.8$6.450

Source model ID: claude-opus-4.8. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-5.6 Sol · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (91.7), while Long Agentic is lowest (48.5). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-5.6 Sol
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic48.5$15.962
Reasoning91.7$0.191
Coding89.7$3.769
Browser88.0$1.338
Data Analysis79.8$0.238
Research54.5$14.426
Design81.6$1.706

Source model ID: gpt-5.6-sol. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Haiku 5.5 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (91.4), while Data Analysis is lowest (53.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Haiku 5.5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic57.6$10.362
Reasoning82.4$0.021
Coding91.4$0.874
Browser80.0$0.460
Data Analysis53.1$0.031
Research81.9$1.940
Design83.1$0.663

Source model ID: claude-haiku-5.5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-5.6 Terra · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (90.6), while Long Agentic is lowest (48.4). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-5.6 Terra
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic48.4$11.757
Reasoning90.6$0.187
Coding86.2$2.715
Browser84.0$0.847
Data Analysis79.3$0.222
Research60.4$7.719
Design76.0$0.620

Source model ID: gpt-5.6-terra. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Grok 4.6 · xAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (91.2), while Long Agentic is lowest (40.7). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Grok 4.6
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic40.7$10.626
Reasoning91.2$0.087
Coding89.1$1.858
Browser64.0$2.921
Data Analysis75.3$0.123
Research84.5$2.325
Design79.8$1.267

Source model ID: grok-4.6. Effort label: xhigh. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

MiMo V2.6 Pro · Xiaomi · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Browser is its highest-scoring suite (88.0), while Long Agentic is lowest (47.5). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for MiMo V2.6 Pro
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic47.5$1.389
Reasoning79.6$0.024
Coding81.5$0.224
Browser88.0$0.457
Data Analysis72.3$0.039
Research76.7$0.142
Design78.5$0.093

Source model ID: mimo-v2.6-pro. Effort label: high. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Muse Spark 1.3 · Meta · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (90.2), while Long Agentic is lowest (40.4). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Muse Spark 1.3
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic40.4$8.839
Reasoning89.7$0.136
Coding90.2$1.372
Browser80.0$1.690
Data Analysis79.6$0.169
Research68.6$2.694
Design74.8$0.829

Source model ID: muse-spark-1.3. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Grok 4.7 · xAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Research is its highest-scoring suite (86.4), while Long Agentic is lowest (50.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Grok 4.7
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic50.1$18.933
Reasoning82.7$0.385
Coding84.5$4.880
Browser60.0$4.778
Data Analysis76.9$0.488
Research86.4$4.577
Design78.0$3.370

Source model ID: grok-4.7. Effort label: xhigh. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash · MiniMax · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Browser is its highest-scoring suite (92.0), while Long Agentic is lowest (34.7). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic34.7$1.280
Reasoning82.9$0.011
Coding83.9$0.246
Browser92.0$0.227
Data Analysis71.4$0.012
Research72.7$0.266
Design74.0$0.158

Source model ID: minimax-m3.1-flash. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Sonnet 5 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (88.7), while Long Agentic is lowest (39.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Sonnet 5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic39.0$33.211
Reasoning88.7$0.255
Coding74.7$3.483
Browser72.0$6.290
Data Analysis71.7$0.310
Research82.8$5.961
Design82.0$5.472

Source model ID: claude-sonnet-5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GLM-5.3 Flash · Z.AI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Browser is its highest-scoring suite (84.0), while Long Agentic is lowest (28.4). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GLM-5.3 Flash
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic28.4$1.629
Reasoning77.6$0.014
Coding80.6$0.170
Browser84.0$0.177
Data Analysis76.4$0.024
Research70.1$0.187
Design77.2$0.063

Source model ID: glm-5.3-flash. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Grok 4.5 · xAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (94.3), while Long Agentic is lowest (27.9). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Grok 4.5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic27.9$4.498
Reasoning87.2$0.088
Coding94.3$0.959
Browser44.0$2.918
Data Analysis73.0$0.114
Research85.9$0.818
Design78.1$0.388

Source model ID: grok-4.5. Effort label: xhigh. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-6 Luna · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (84.5), while Research is lowest (43.5). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-6 Luna
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic48.1$0.968
Reasoning81.8$0.021
Coding84.5$0.095
Browser72.0$0.238
Data Analysis73.4$0.017
Research43.5$0.355
Design82.5$0.031

Source model ID: gpt-6-luna. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Qwen3.8 Flash · Alibaba · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (87.4), while Long Agentic is lowest (37.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Qwen3.8 Flash
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic37.1$1.872
Reasoning87.4$0.022
Coding87.4$0.106
Browser48.0$0.224
Data Analysis74.2$0.043
Research74.6$0.317
Design72.8$0.128

Source model ID: qwen3.8-flash. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-5.5 · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (89.7), while Long Agentic is lowest (44.6). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-5.5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic44.6$13.851
Reasoning89.7$0.289
Coding85.1$4.208
Browser48.0$5.620
Data Analysis81.6$0.406
Research61.6$17.138
Design70.3$1.190

Source model ID: gpt-5.5. Effort label: xhigh. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Gemini 3.8 Flash · Google · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (89.3), while Long Agentic is lowest (30.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Gemini 3.8 Flash
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic30.1$7.039
Reasoning89.3$0.148
Coding82.2$2.296
Browser64.0$1.213
Data Analysis54.0$0.238
Research79.1$2.638
Design72.7$0.980

Source model ID: gemini-3.8-flash. Effort label: high. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Gemini 3.7 Flash · Google · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (87.8), while Long Agentic is lowest (28.3). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Gemini 3.7 Flash
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic28.3$5.558
Reasoning87.8$0.069
Coding80.5$1.732
Browser56.0$1.069
Data Analysis68.0$0.167
Research76.5$2.684
Design73.2$0.623

Source model ID: gemini-3.7-flash. Effort label: high. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GPT-5.6 Luna · OpenAI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (85.6), while Long Agentic is lowest (30.4). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GPT-5.6 Luna
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic30.4$1.101
Reasoning85.6$0.028
Coding73.6$1.823
Browser68.0$0.097
Data Analysis78.0$0.027
Research51.0$0.821
Design76.0$0.090

Source model ID: gpt-5.6-luna. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (86.4), while Long Agentic is lowest (23.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Sonnet 4.6
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic23.1$20.420
Reasoning86.4$0.313
Coding66.6$2.629
Browser68.0$3.375
Data Analysis76.1$0.417
Research63.6$3.902
Design71.8$2.139

Source model ID: claude-sonnet-4.6. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Qwen3.8 Max · Alibaba · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (88.2), while Browser is lowest (32.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Qwen3.8 Max
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic42.3$14.930
Reasoning88.2$0.131
Coding60.3$1.987
Browser32.0$1.543
Data Analysis78.4$0.219
Research69.9$1.955
Design78.6$0.596

Source model ID: qwen3.8-max. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision · DeepSeek · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (85.4), while Coding is lowest (37.6). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic39.0$1.041
Reasoning85.4$0.085
Coding37.6$0.040
Browser64.0$0.432
Data Analysis79.5$0.079
Research69.2$0.249
Design70.7$0.059

Source model ID: deepseek-v4-flash-vision. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Kimi K3 · Moonshot AI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (90.7), while Browser is lowest (16.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Kimi K3
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic42.8$17.990
Reasoning90.7$0.195
Coding59.3$2.061
Browser16.0$0.382
Data Analysis78.7$0.352
Research79.0$2.405
Design77.2$1.001

Source model ID: kimi-k3. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Qwen3.8 27B · Alibaba · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (86.8), while Long Agentic is lowest (27.9). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Qwen3.8 27B
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic27.9$7.184
Reasoning80.0$0.075
Coding86.8$0.690
Browser32.0$1.290
Data Analysis76.6$0.089
Research59.4$1.127
Design75.9$0.384

Source model ID: qwen3.8-27b. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Muse Spark 1.2 · Meta · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (90.0), while Long Agentic is lowest (21.3). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Muse Spark 1.2
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic21.3$3.949
Reasoning90.0$0.099
Coding78.2$1.466
Browser36.0$2.495
Data Analysis76.5$0.109
Research67.7$1.783
Design67.1$0.856

Source model ID: muse-spark-1.2. Effort label: xhigh. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Step 5 (Preview) · StepFun · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (85.6), while Browser is lowest (24.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Step 5 (Preview)
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic27.5$10.376
Reasoning83.8$0.048
Coding85.6$1.095
Browser24.0$2.792
Data Analysis63.5$0.064
Research72.8$1.229
Design76.9$0.746

Source model ID: step-5-preview. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

GLM-5.3 · Z.AI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (85.8), while Browser is lowest (0.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for GLM-5.3
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic35.9$18.382
Reasoning85.8$0.265
Coding82.8$2.138
Browser0.0Not available
Data Analysis70.2$0.373
Research73.2$1.635
Design77.3$0.956

Source model ID: glm-5.3. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Muse Spark Open · Meta · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Research is its highest-scoring suite (80.3), while Long Agentic is lowest (18.9). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Muse Spark Open
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic18.9$4.834
Reasoning73.7$0.043
Coding73.6$1.253
Browser36.0$2.643
Data Analysis60.2$0.045
Research80.3$0.732
Design60.3$0.356

Source model ID: muse-spark-open. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Beam 1.0 · Reflection AI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Coding is its highest-scoring suite (83.9), while Browser is lowest (0.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Beam 1.0
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic17.3$14.057
Reasoning80.2$0.040
Coding83.9$1.852
Browser0.0Not available
Data Analysis66.4$0.075
Research72.8$2.385
Design67.9$0.375

Source model ID: beam-1.0. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Gemini 3.1 Pro · Google · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (84.0), while Browser is lowest (4.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Gemini 3.1 Pro
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic23.9$8.126
Reasoning84.0$0.148
Coding66.7$1.291
Browser4.0$1.777
Data Analysis78.5$0.260
Research65.7$0.770
Design61.6$0.596

Source model ID: gemini-3.1-pro. Effort label: high. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

MiniMax M3 · MiniMax · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Data Analysis is its highest-scoring suite (76.2), while Browser is lowest (8.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for MiniMax M3
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic12.4$4.195
Reasoning74.5$0.019
Coding70.9$0.455
Browser8.0$0.429
Data Analysis76.2$0.029
Research68.0$0.252
Design66.2$0.208

Source model ID: minimax-m3. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Inkling · Thinking Machines · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (78.3), while Long Agentic is lowest (14.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Inkling
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic14.1$12.406
Reasoning78.3$0.104
Coding64.0$1.877
Browser16.0$2.396
Data Analysis72.8$0.145
Research59.9$1.668
Design58.3$0.286

Source model ID: inkling. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL · NVIDIA · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (78.8), while Browser is lowest (4.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic15.8$2.048
Reasoning78.8$0.013
Coding65.5$0.331
Browser4.0$0.351
Data Analysis64.6$0.019
Research70.9$0.167
Design60.7$0.056

Source model ID: nemotron-super-vl-3.5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Mistral Large 4 · Mistral AI · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (83.9), while Browser is lowest (8.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Mistral Large 4
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic11.8$9.556
Reasoning83.9$0.119
Coding60.0$0.983
Browser8.0$0.451
Data Analysis76.5$0.134
Research28.1$2.327
Design65.6$0.389

Source model ID: mistral-large-4. Effort label: high. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Claude Haiku 4.5 · Anthropic · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (61.7), while Long Agentic is lowest (11.1). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Claude Haiku 4.5
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic11.1$2.549
Reasoning61.7Not available
Coding48.1$0.494
Browser40.0$1.502
Data Analysis59.3Not available
Research42.2$0.432
Design59.9$0.156

Source model ID: claude-haiku-4.5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Gemma 4 31B · Google · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (68.3), while Browser is lowest (4.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Gemma 4 31B
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic13.3$0.989
Reasoning68.3$0.004
Coding49.0$0.233
Browser4.0$0.254
Data Analysis53.3$0.005
Research44.4$0.038
Design58.4$0.015

Source model ID: gemma-4-31b. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest · Our model-family context

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Nemotron 3 Ultra · NVIDIA · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Reasoning is its highest-scoring suite (74.7), while Browser is lowest (0.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Nemotron 3 Ultra
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic11.2$5.247
Reasoning74.7$0.138
Coding43.6$1.013
Browser0.0$0.569
Data Analysis54.5$0.183
Research43.2$1.958
Design58.6$0.069

Source model ID: nemotron-ultra-3. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning · NVIDIA · 7/7 suite scores

Within this run: Design is its highest-scoring suite (43.9), while Browser is lowest (0.0). Suite difficulty differs, so this spread is a diagnostic starting point rather than proof of task suitability.

Suite evidence for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
SuiteScore / 100USD / measured task
Long Agentic8.3$0.560
Reasoning42.9$0.022
Coding22.6$0.085
Browser0.0$0.120
Data Analysis43.1$0.014
Research40.0$0.087
Design43.9$0.030

Source model ID: nemotron-lightning-3.5. Effort label: max. Source release: 2026-10-14. Scores describe this benchmark configuration, not every API endpoint or consumer app carrying a similar name.

Check the original release · Original score CSV · Publisher link from source manifest

For a real decision, test a representative input, check the produced artifact and record correction effort. Use our workflow evaluation method rather than treating a small rank difference as a production guarantee.

What this board helps you decide

Use the overall view for a shortlist, then select the suite closest to your actual work. Coding, browser tasks and research briefs exercise different capabilities. Compare two or three runs and inspect where their scores diverge before choosing a pilot.

Read the measurement boundary

These are published LiveBench results, not tests performed by AI Tools Ratings. Suite scores use a 0–100 scale but are not one universal accuracy percentage. We do not add vendor launch claims or infer scores for missing results.

Recorded benchmark cost is a task-run measurement from this release. It is not a current API token quote or subscription price. Equal-weight quality scores and question-weighted costs answer different questions; read the formulas and limitations before comparing value.

Model-family profiles · Editorial comparisons · Report a source or identity mismatch

Get listed

Put your AI tool in front of people who are already comparing options.

Submit a listing for editorial review. Include a live website, current pricing and a clear use case. We may request more information before publication.

Submit a tool