Publisher: Anthropic · Editorial profile by AI Tools Ratings · Review method
Not runtime tested; source-document review only. No security certification.
What task is this skill designed for?
Prepare an authorized Anthropic-related internal artifact and check its font fallbacks, colors and readability.
What input and output should you expect?
Input: An artifact that legitimately calls for Anthropic styling, the intended medium, the text content and the available fonts.
Output: Expected, not independently tested: a styled artifact that follows the source’s stated palette and type choices. Trademark permission is not established by a source-code license.
What does it need to run?
A Claude-compatible environment and a rendering or editing tool for the artifact type. The source names Poppins and Lora with fallback fonts; those fonts must be available and appropriate for the output environment.
Published by Anthropic as a Claude skill example; its repository documents Claude Code installation. Not independently installed or executed here.
How should you approach installation?
- Inspect the pinned source and its license, keeping brand rights separate from code licensing.
- Confirm the artifact’s purpose and font availability before installation or use.
- Trial a non-public artifact and review both styling and permitted brand usage.
Installation guide: discovery, dependencies and runtime checks
What files, accounts or data can it access?
Can alter artifact styling and use provided fonts or brand assets. Confirm authority to use brand identifiers, especially for public or commercial material.
What does the skill cost?
No separate skill price is listed. Fonts, editing tools and agent usage may have their own terms.
What are its limits and alternatives?
Do not apply Anthropic branding to an unrelated product or imply endorsement. Color values alone do not prove accessible contrast in every pairing, and missing fonts can change layout.
Use your own documented brand tokens for your company’s work. Choose this skill only when Anthropic-specific styling is appropriate, or study it as a narrowly scoped brand-guidance pattern.
What could you ask in a small trial?
Try this with a small sample:
Review this authorized Anthropic-related artifact against the supplied brand guidance. Identify unavailable fonts, check readability and avoid adding any claim of endorsement.
How would you verify the result?
- Confirm the artifact is entitled to use the named branding.
- Check the rendered font and fallback behavior.
- Inspect contrast, spacing and export output in the actual delivery format.
Use a baseline and record acceptance evidence before treating a successful task as a reliable workflow.
Which source and license were checked?
Read the reviewed SKILL.md at its pinned commit · Complete reviewed folder
Repository and current publisher guidance
Checked:
Apache-2.0 — identified in skills/brand-guidelines/LICENSE.txt at the reviewed commit. Third-party assets and dependencies may have separate terms. License evidence
Version details and review scope
Source: anthropics/skills/skills/brand-guidelines
Reviewed commit: dbd4588f9e1033efb41dad4bef2f7947c8993d44
SKILL.md SHA-256: 1120b3769e2985cefb3d25be981b1f914abeba57ae079b83c20c666c164fa9fe
Source-document review. Source text and stated dependencies were inspected for this profile. Referenced code was not comprehensively audited, no runtime test was performed, and source files are not mirrored here.